During and after the fireworks in Vancouver on Saturday night, many people wanted to get on Canucks head coach John Tortorella for being so mad. Claiming that if he didn’t want or expect that to happen, he should have put out a more skilled line.

I disagree.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

He shouldn’t have made his way to the Calgary Flames dressing room but that doesnt mean he can’t be upset about the start to the game.


Yes, every once in a while a team starts their fourth line and it doesn’t always result in a line brawl but Torterella couldn’t risk putting his skill guys out there. I don’t think if they countered Calgary’s fourth line with the Sedin line, the twins would have gotten mauled but how do you really know?

You don’t start that line with Brian McGrattan and Kevin Westgarth, two of the toughest in the game, without the intention of a big physical start. Whether it’s running around to set a physical tone or actually fighting someone.

It’s hard to know what was said between Westgarth who was playing center for some reason and Kevin Bieksa but it sure looked like Westgarth was more than ready to do something dumb and it didn’t matter who was taking the draw. Westgarth did immediately jump an unwilling guy and then grabbed Kellen Lain and made him fight 2 seconds into his first NHL game.

If things were different and a skilled Canuck player was injured or beat up badly because they didn’t respond with the right line, who is everyone blaming today?

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

The head coach of course.

It happened to Randy Carlyle in pre-season this year, when he put out Phil Kessel with John Scott. His best player was put in a bad spot because he didn’t expect it to happen. “I never believed in my wildest dreams that the attack would come directed at that type of player from the opposition, but I was wrong.” He said.


A very memorable game I was playing in 2006 had a similar situation as far as player selection. The game was in Washington versus the Atlanta Thrashers who were coached at that time by none other than Bob Hartley.  His teams were always pretty tough and we had some good battles with them.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

It was late in the game and six foot five Andy Sutton took a big run at one of our young defenseman Mike Green. This wasn’t a little run; this was a take your head off and hurt you type run. The third or fourth time he had done this late in a hockey game against us. Green thankfully avoided it, but the intent was absolutely there to hurt someone once again.

After the hit, a small melee ensued. This left each team playing 3 on 3.  Our bench was irate. Many four letter words were exchanged before the next faceoff. What happened next is, Hartley either misread the situation or he intended to diffuse it with the players he put out.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below


We were at home and had last change. Hartley sent out Greg DeVries, Vitaly Vishnevskiy and Marian Hossa of all guys. Our head coach Glen Hanlon answered with Donald Brashear, John Erskine and Matt Bradley. Everyone knew what was going to happen whether you like it or not. We were not going to be pushed around again.

Brashear beat the snot out of Vishnevskiy, Erskine gave Hossa a rough ride and DeVries and Bradley paired off.

Now this incident in 2006 happened at the end of an extremely heated game with rules in place to prevent instigating and shenanigans in the last 5 minutes so perhaps there was a sense of protection the Thrashers bench felt?

Either way, the end result was players that shouldn’t have been out there for Atlanta were and Hartley made a huge mistake. Andy Sutton and Bob Hartley have to feel terrible for getting their guys pummelled.


The situation in the Flames-Canucks game was different. There wasn’t a heated incident immediately before, but as a coach I don’t think you can take that chance, especially if you have last change.

Torterella is vilified more today if Daniel Sedin is mugged or their team is completely taken advantage of.  He protected his team, which is what a coach is supposed to do. He had no choice but to put out a comparable line of grit and toughness. That doesn’t mean he has to be happy with what unfolded next.

No one knows what might have happened had Tortorella put out a skilled line. This game is unpredictable and rules don’t often matter in the heat of the moment. Assuming nothing, could have been very costly for him, more than the fine or suspension he will likely receive and deserve for his intermission antics. He could have lost his best players or that dressing room.

Has Bob Hartley ever tried to diffuse a situation again, when put in Tortorella’s spot?

I doubt it. 

  • Brian Sutherby

    Torterella is vilified more today if Daniel Sedin is mugged or their team is completely taken advantage of. He protected his team, which is what a coach is supposed to do. He had no choice but to put out a comparable line of grit and toughness.

    Well said, Brian. I also agree that Fonzie’s between-period act deserves a suspension.

  • Brian Sutherby

    Bob Hartley sent out his 4th line, a line made up of players that had combined for 3 goals in 76 games this season, to start the game – the first time in 49 games this season he had done so. He sent out a player that had previously only taken 2 faceoffs all season to win the opening faceoff and to, apparently, score a goal. I think we all know why Hartley put those guys on the ice and it wasn’t to create offence.

    • Parallex

      Sure… but I’m pretty sure he didn’t put them out there to start a line brawl either. Blair Jones & Chris Butler aren’t what folk would generally refer to as “tough customers”… why send those guys out when Lance Bouma and SOB are dressed? Probably thought that he’d put McGrattan out there to get the ritual “you injured my guy last time now we have to fight” over and done with but then Tortorella’s maniac routine raised the temperture.

      Regardless this whole articule is poorly thought out… by the logic expoused here no coach can ever put any line out against another teams fourth line except their own fourth line… for some reason I’m pretty sure if the Flames fourth line iced the puck Tortorella wouldn’t have any objection to throwing the Sedins over the boards. He had a choice and he choose to take the outcome that Hartley offered up. His act of personal affrontery was buffoonish at best.

  • elvis15

    One other point I don’t think has been brought up is Hartley tries to sell them being the starters by saying they scored in the last game. While McGrattan and Westgarth were on the ice for the Bouma goal in the previous game (at the end when the game was out of reach) none of that line has had a single point in some time. The last point of any kind for that forward group was Dec 12, when McGrattan had an assist, and Dec 21 for the defence, when Butler had an assist.

  • elvis15

    I don’t get how Hartley is to blame here.

    The Canucks have been going on for the last 2 weeks about how they are going to be tough to play against. How’s that working for ya?

    Hartley has every right to throw out the big boys. Like has already been said, if the Flames had their 4th line out for an icing call and couldn’t change, Torts would have had the Sedins out in an instant.

    Did Hartley bait Torts? You bet he did. Did Torts take the bait? Right again.

    Torts trip to the dressing room is where he crossed the line. About a 2 game suspension seems appropriate to me.

  • elvis15

    The heart, energy, desire that the Flames are showing despite that it’s early in their rebuild and the team has very little talent is exciting. This identity is a critical element of a successful rebuild.

    Unlike the Oilers who have had 3 consecutive 1st overall’s (soon a 4th) and much more talent they are listless, lifeless, heartless, and most important they have developed a culture of no accountability and losing that will be very difficult to change!

    • D-Unit

      The Oilers have held coaches, Tom Renney, Ralph Krueger, and GM Steve Tambellini accountable.

      It has taught the players, it is not their problem, the coach will get fired, and we never have fault. Win or lose, the pay cheque goes in the bank.

    • piscera.infada

      For sure. We can argue the actions to the death – I’m not too sure the answer is as easy as ‘x’ coach is wrong. The nice thing about the whole pinata from a Flames perspective is that there’s a pulse. You can say whatever you want about the skill (or lack thereof), but to me, that game proves they aren’t going down without a fight. I like that, and see it as a crucial component of a successful “rebuild”.

  • beloch

    First of all, I take issue with using “player selection” in the title of your article, which strongly suggests a comparison between Hartley and Ron Rolston, who was fined for “player selection” in the pre-season. That was a completely different situation. It wasn’t the first faceoff. He sent a goon out to attack one of his opponents stars because he wanted revenge for a fight that occurred previously in the game.

    I’m not going to pretend Hartley wasn’t spoiling for a goon-fight. You don’t start the game with your goon-squad if you aren’t. However, Torts wanted it too. If he didn’t want a fight, he had numerous options. He had four bloody lines to choose from, and three of them could have outplayed what Hartley put on the ice. He choose his goons. He could have instructed his goons that they were, under no circumstances, to accept a challenge to fight. They’d have looked like pussies but the Flames would have started the game with a penalty. Torts did no such thing. He sent his goons out there with implicit orders to do what goons do. Fight. He also sent out a rookie, which suggests he doesn’t like that rookie very much, but whatever.

    He clearly wasn’t expecting a full line-brawl, and that’s why he was probably so incensed after it happened. He must have thought Hartley sent his goon squad out with orders to not just start one fight, but five of them! If you ignore 20/20 hindsight and consider what’s likely to happen if you send a line out with orders to start a 10 player brawl, you’ll rapidly realize Torts assumption was utterly idiotic. One goon fight was intended by both sides. The brawl was spontaneous.

    Now, no matter how angry you are, NHL coaches are generally expected to be above charging into their opponents dressing room looking for a physical confrontation. Torts owes a lot to McGrattan, one of the very goons he professes to despise, for first keeping him out of the dressing room (where he would have been gang-pummeled) and then stopping Clint Malarchuk from going after him. Malarchuk might not be a man-mountain, but he is one tough SOB. The goons had more class than Torts that day!

  • piscera.infada

    Anyone who argues the Flames and Hartly weren’t out to fight, go watch the replay of the start of the whole line brawl.

    Bieksa cleanly wins the face off. Why? Westgarth doesn’t even try to win it, and just jumps straight on Bieksa.

    If that doesn’t show you that he’s just looking for a fight (and the Canucks aren’t), I don’t know what does.

  • andyg

    Who are all the people who are posting on here? Tons of names that I have never seen before. I guess the game must have been entertaining.

    I think Torts did ever thing right but the hall way nonsense. H Sedin has something wrong with his ribs and Burrows is coming off a broken jaw. That’s who Calgary lined their 2 toughest players against. That would send alarms off for me.

  • elvis15

    I was wondering why so many teams hate the Canucks, Chi, Bos, now Flames, soon the Oilers. Classless and cheapshot with that clown Kassian after he broke Gagner jaws then taunt him last game. Somebody beat the snot out of him Tue game please.

    • beloch

      I think when teams have some success then they turn into a polarizing. I don’t think people pay much mind to the Flames until Hartley pulled that BS move last Sat. Welcome to the Brian Burke mind-set. Little success and lots of penalty minutes.