Jets Better Not Believe Their Apologists

Nation World HQ
December 26 2011 03:03PM

 

As the end of December approaches and a truly frightening test grows larger on the horizon, real fans in Winnipeg would like nothing more than to have the their beloved Jets ignore the media noise.

Sure, a lot of the fans are a source of that noise, but those who would like to see the Jets emerge from a difficult January-February road show with at least a shot at making the playoffs, want nothing more (or less) than to have the Jets drown out last week's silly rationalizations for losing.

When the excuses for last Friday night's 4-1 loss to the Pittsburgh Penguins began to emerge, it became clear that if this Jets team listens to its apologists in the media, its playoff future is extremely dim. Seems those people, for whatever reason, have decided that the Jets problem last week -- a 2-2-1 record at home in five games, including a 3-2 shootout loss to the Islanders, a 1-0 loss to Washington and a 4-1 loss to Pittsburgh -- was fatigue, not the fact that their opponents often outplayed them.

In fact, one reporter wrote: "It's a good thing the Winnipeg Jets can now take a few nights off to rest, as fatigue was a clear factor in their 4-1 loss to the Pittsburgh Penguins Friday night at MTS Centre."

Huh?

Apparently, the fact the Jets played three games in four nights, the last two back-to-back, in their own building, meant that they were just too tired to compete with the Penguins. Evidently, it had nothing to do with the fact that the Pens are terrifically coached, have a handful of offensive stars (even without Sidney Crosby) and play with toughness, skill and responsibility in their own zone. Marc-Andre Fleury isn't bad, either.

A lot of media people in Winnipeg did not want to believe that an opposing team was simply better than "their" Jets. Of course, it's not as if one of hockey's great myths hasn't been used as an excuse before.

After all, the media -- a group that, to a great extent, is made up of a lot of people who have never played on a sports team before -- love to claim that if a hockey team plays back-to-back games, it's very likely the players will be dead tired and will always lose on the second night.

That, of course, is poppycock. In fact, more than one NHL executive has said that he loves it when his team plays back-to-back games, especially at home.

"If I had any input at all into my schedule, I'd ask for as many back-to-back games as I could get," said former Winnipeg Jets GM and head coach John Paddock, now assistant GM of the Philadelphia Flyers. "In all my life in hockey, I've come to the conclusion that players would much rather play than practice. We grew up playing four games in a weekend tournament. If you're going to survive the Stanley Cup, you often have to play four games in seven nights. Guys have to play 15-20 minutes a night. These guys are in their 20s. They aren't tired."

Paddock certainly has reason to feel the way he does. It seems that losing the second game of back-to-back games has always had more to do with whether or not he had a good team than the contention that he might have had a bunch of tired 26-year-olds (the Jets' average age today).

For instance, the 1984-85 Jets, an extremely good team, played 13 back-to-back games that season. They went 7-2-4 in second games. Paddock's 1995-96 Jets, a mediocre team that barely made the playoffs, had nine back-to-back segments and went 5-3-1 in second games. You can go through the history of back-to-back games with any team in the NHL and come to one conclusion: If it was a good team, it usually won Game 2. If it was a pretty bad team, it usually lost Game 2. Even mediocre teams that might have barely made the playoffs and were eliminated early in the post-season, often won Game 2s.

However, the 2011-12 Jets team is 0-5-0 in the second game of back-to-back games so far this season -- they lost 4-1 in Ottawa on Oct. 20, 3-0 to the Rangers in Manhattan on Nov. 6, 4-2 in Boston on Nov. 26, 7-1 in Detroit on Dec. 10 and 4-1 to Pittsburgh (in Winnipeg) on Dec. 23. 

So if you want to believe that three-games-in-four-nights or back-to-back games will tucker a team right out, then you might just as well write off the Jets in January and February right now. 

Beginning on Nov. 29, the Jets had 13 of their next 15 games at home. That run is slmost over. The Jets play Tuesday night in Denver against the Colorado Avalanche and then come home to play the Los Angeles Kings on Thursday and the Toronto Maple Leafs on Saturday (So three games in five days is no problem, but three in four is trouble?). Right now, the Jets are 7-4-1 in the first 12 of that stretch. They need to win all three of their remaining games to come away with at least 21 of a possible 30 points in that stretch -- which is what everyone agreed they needed with January and February coming up.

Meanwhile, if this last week was tough, the next two months will be impossble.

On Jan. 4, the Jets begin a stretch with 15 of their next 21 on the road. They play back-to-back road games four times: Jan. 4 in Montreal and Jan. 5 in Toronto; Jan. 16 in Ottawa and Jan. 17 in New Jersey; Jan. 23 in Carolina and Jan. 24 in Manhattan; and Feb. 2 in Tampa and Feb. 3 in Sunrise. They play three games in four nights on three occasions during that stretch: Jan. 14 vs. New Jersey, Jan. 16 in Ottawa and Jan. 17 back in New Jersey; Feb. 2 in Tampa, Feb. 3 in Sunrise and Feb 5 (at 1 in the afternoon) in Montreal; and Jan. 16 in Minnesota, Jan. 17 against Boston and Jan. 19 against Colorado. In fact, during that, they play four games in six days on three different occasions.

If the Jets were fatigued on Friday night, they won't be able to muster up the energy to put on their skates in January and February. 

Which is why Jets fans, especially those who actually know something about (a) hockey and (b) NHL scheduling, hope their team doesn't pay any attention at all to a media that loves to make excuses for the team they cheer, but don't have a clue how the game actually works. 

After all, if the Jets start to believe what they read, they will not survive the next two months.

F586bf3d4cee22713929dc51e27634b4
We are the people that keep this whole circus running. We get no love but get to see Wanye freak out about stuff in person which is kind of a trade off.
Avatar
#1 The House Of Volda
December 26 2011, 04:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Great article, Scott. Right now, there are far too many players that are MIA. Evander Kane and Zach Bogosian especially. I don't buy into the age excuse. The Edmonton Oilers back in the early 80's were young as well when they strung together all those Stanley Cups. I don't buy into the travel and the schedule.....as every team has charters these days. Something very few teams had even 20-30 years ago.

I also have a hard time understanding this so-called 'cloud of losing' that followed them to Winnipeg from the Atlanta years. There are a lot of guys that are called to step up as youngsters, that grab hold of responsibility. Obviously, the Atlanta Thrasher organization did a pretty good job piecing this team together. But at the end of the day, the results on ice fall on the players. So sweeping the 'Atlanta Experience' under the carpet as a reason for their present short-comings seems like mis-placed blame.

This team had coaching and quality stars in Atlanta.....to only fall short and under-produce/achieve time and time again.

So IMHO, it's really a lack of finish and overall 'responsibility.' Playing a complete 200ft game. Whether it be North South or East West version. A good team adapts and learns to play in a complete mode, no matter their opponent.

The excuses are running thin. This team has apparent on-ice talent. The coaching team seems professional and solid.

But how many coaches, line-up changes, and excuses can be tolerated, and used as reasons for failure when this song seems to be skipping every time the needle spins around?

You either buy a new record, or write a new song!

Avatar
#2 MC Hockey
December 26 2011, 06:03PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Hi Scott and readers, Agreed that the silliness in thinking the back-to-back game scenarios will tire out the young Jets in January and February. Perhaps near the end of the long 2 months of road games, this could be true but unlikely unless the guys party too much after games (does that still happen in the NHL?). Also agree local media types in Winnipeg need to admit when teams like Pittsburgh or Vancouver or Detroit or whomever dominate the Jets, it's simply because they are better, more complete teams. Being a born-and-bred Winnipegger who moved away when the Jets first left (and still a couple provinces west of Winnipeg) I don't get caught up in the Manitoba media, so perhaps that's to my advantage!

Avatar
#3 FRT
December 27 2011, 02:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Then by that argument...let them play back to back and 3 games in 4 days during the PLAYOFFS! Then Lord Stosh can be handed out BEFORE Victoria Day instead of Canada Day. Plus it is FACT THAT THIS BRUTAL SKED has the NHL seeing more injuries and concussions then at any time before in NHL history!

Comments are closed for this article.